Article Contents

MEASUREMENTS OF PARTICLE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND NEW PARTICLE FORMATION EVENTS DURING WINTER IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA REGION, CHINA

Funding:


doi: 10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009

  • Particle number size distribution (PNSD) between 10 nm and 20 μm were measured in the Pearl River Delta(PRD) region in winter 2011. The average particle number concentration of the nucleation mode (10-20 nm), Aitken mode (20-100 nm), accumulation mode (100 nm-1 μm) and coarse mode (1-20 μm) particles were 1 552, 7 470, 4 012, and 19 cm-3, respectively. The volume concentration of accumulation mode particles with peak at 300 nm accounted for over 70% of the total volume concentration. Diurnal variations and dependencies on meteorological parameters of PNSD were investigated. The diurnal variation of nucleation mode particles was mainly influenced by new particle formation events, while the diurnal variation of Aitken mode particles correlated to the traffic emission and the growth process of nucleation mode particles. When the PRD region was controlled by a cold high pressure, conditions of low relative humidity, high wind speed and strong radiation are favorable for the occurrence of new particle formation (NPF) events. The frequency of occurrence of NPF events was 21.3% during the whole measurement period. Parameters describing NPF events, including growth rate (GR) and source rate of condensable vapor (Q), were slightly larger than those in previous literature. This suggests that intense photochemical and biological activities may be the source of condensable vapor for particle growth, even during winter in the PRD.
  • [1] CHYLEK P, COAKLEY J A. Aerosol and climate [J]. Science, 1974, 183(4120): 75-77.
    [2] POPE C A. What do epidemiologic findings tell us about health effects of environmental aerosols? [J]. J Aerosol Med, 2000, 13(4): 335-354.
    [3] ATKINSON R W, ROSS?A H, SUNYER J, et al. Acute effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory admissions: results form APHEA 2 project [J]. Amer J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 164(10): 1 860-1 866.
    [4] KREYLING W G, SEMMLER M, M?LLER W. Dosimetry and toxicology of ultrafine particles [J]. J Aeros Med, 2004, 17(2): 140-152.
    [5] PENTTINEN P, TIMONEN K L, TIITTANEN P, et al. Number concentration and size of particles in urban air: effects on spirometric lung function in adult asthmatic subjects [J]. Environ Health Presp, 2001, 109(4): 319-323.
    [6] DUSEK U, FRANK G P, HILDEBRANDT L, et al. Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles [J]. Science, 2006, 312(5778): 1 375-1 378.
    [7] SEE S W, BALASUBRAMANIAN R, WANG W. A study of the physical, chemical, and optical properties of ambient aerosol particles in Southeast Asia during hazy and nonhazy days [J]. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111(D10): D10S08.
    [8] SEINFELD J H, PANDIS S N. Atmospheric chemistry and physics [M]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1998.
    [9] HUSSEIN T, MASO M D, PET?J? T, et al. Evaluation of an automatic algorithm for fitting the particle number size distributions [J]. Boreal Environ Res, 2005, 10(5): 337-355.
    [10] WHITBY K T. California aerosols: Their physical and chemical characteristics [J]. Adv Environ Sci Technol, 1980, 9:477-525.
    [11] BIRMILI W, WIEDENSOHLER A, HEINTZENBERG J, et al. Atmospheric particle number size distribution in central Europe: Statistical relations to air masses and meteorology [J]. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106(D23): 32 005-32 018.
    [12] DAL MASO M, SOGACHEVA L, AALTO P P, et al. Aerosol size distribution measurements at four Nordic field stations: identification, analysis and trajectory analysis of new particle formation bursts [J]. Tellus B, 2007, 59(3): 350-361.
    [13] SHEN X J, SUN J Y, ZHANG Y M, et al. First long-term study of particle number size distributions and new particle formation events of regional aerosol in the North China Plain [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2011, 11(4): 1 565-1 580.
    [14] BOULON J, SELLEGRI K, VENZAC H, et al. New particle formation and ultrafine charged aerosol climatology at a high altitude site in the Alps (Jungfraujoch, 3580 m a.s.l., Switzerland) [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2010, 10(19): 9 333-9 349.
    [15] WEBER R J, MCMURRY P H, MAULDIN R L, et al. New particle formation in the remote troposphere: A comparison of observations at various sites [J]. Geophys Res Lett, 1999, 26(3): 307-310.
    [16] LAAKSO L, HUSSEIN T, AARNIO P, et al. Diurnal and annual characteristics of particle mass and number concentrations in urban, rural and Arctic environments in Finland [J]. Atmos Environ, 2003, 37(19): 2 629-2 641.
    [17] O'DOWD C D, GEEVER M, HILL M K, et al. New particle formation: Nucleation rates and spatial scales in the clean marine coastal environment [J]. Geophys Res Lett, 1998, 25(10): 1 661-1 664.
    [18] VENZAC H, SELLEGRI K, LAJ P, et al. High frequency new particle formation in the Himalayas [J]. P Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105(41): 15 666-15 671.
    [19] NIEMI J V, SAARIKOSKI S, AURELA M, et al. Long-range transport episodes of fine particles in southern Finland during 1999�C2007 [J]. Atmos Environ, 2009, 43(6): 1 255-1 264.
    [20] BIRMILI W, BERRESHEIM H, PLASS-DüLMER C, et al. The Hohenpeissenberg aerosol formation experiment (HAFEX): A long-term study including size-resolved aerosol, H2SO4, OH, and monoterpenes measurements [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2003, 3(2): 361-376.
    [21] TUNVED P, HANSSON H C, KULMALA M, et al. One year boundary layer aerosol size distribution data from five nordic background stations [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2003, 3(6): 2 183-2 205.
    [22] WEHNER B, WIEDENSOHLER A. Long term measurements of submicrometer urban aerosols: statistical analysis for correlations with meteorological conditions and trace gases [J]. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2003, 3(3): 867-879.
    [23] HUSSEIN T, PUUSTINEN A, AALTO P P, et al. Urban aerosol number size distributions [J]. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2004, 4(2): 391-411.
    [24] STANIER C O, KHLYSTOV A Y, PANDIS S N. Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS) [J]. Atmos Environ, 2004, 38(20): 3 275-3 284.
    [25] BIRMILI W, WIEDENSOHLER A. New particle formation in the continental boundary layer: Meteorological and gas phase parameter influence [J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2000, 27(20): 3 325-3 328.
    [26] KULMALA M. How Particles Nucleate and Grow [J]. Science, 2003, 302(5647): 1 000-1 001.
    [27] KULMALA M, VEHKAM?KI H, PET?J? T, et al. Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations [J]. J Aeros Sci, 2004, 35(2): 143-176.
    [28] WU Z, HU M, LIU S, et al. New particle formation in Beijing, China: Statistical analysis of a 1-year data set [J]. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112(D9): D09209.
    [29] YUE D, HU M, Wu Z, et al. Characteristics of aerosol size distributions and new particle formation in the summer in Beijing [J]. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114(D2): D00G12.
    [30] KULMALA M, LAAKSO L, LEHTINEN K E J, et al. Initial steps of aerosol growth [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2004, 4(11/12): 2 553-2 560.
    [31] CHAN C K, YAO X. Air pollution in mega cities in China [J]. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42(1): 1-42.
    [32] ANDREAE M O, SCHMID O, YANG H, et al. Optical properties and chemical composition of the atmospheric aerosol in urban Guangzhou, China [J]. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42(25): 6 335-6 350.
    [33] ZHANG Y H, HU M, ZHONG L J, et al. Regional integrated experiments on air quality over Pearl River Delta 2004 (PRIDE-PRD2004): Overview [J]. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42(25): 6 157-6 173.
    [34] TAN Hao-bo, WU Dui, DENG Xue-jiao. Observation of aerosol optical depth over the Pearl River Delta [J]. Acta Sci Circumst, 2009, 29(6): 1 146-1 155 (in Chinese).
    [35] WU D, TIE X, LI C, et al. An extremely low visibility event over the Guangzhou region: A case study [J]. Atmos Environ, 2005, 39(35): 6 568-6 577.
    [36] CHEN Huan-huan, WU Dui, TAN Hao-bo, et al. Study on the character of haze weather process from the year 2001 to 2008 over the Pearl River Delta [J]. J Trop Meteorol, 2010, 26(2): 147-155 (in Chinese).
    [37] WILLEKE K, BARON P A. Aerosol measurement principles, techniques, and application [M]. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Hoboken, NJ, 1993.
    [38] WOO K, CHEN D, PUI D, et al. Measurement of Atlanta aerosol size distributions: Observations of ultrafine particle events [J]. Aerosol Sci Tech, 2001, 34(1): 75-87.
    [39] WU Z, HU M, LIN P, et al. Particle number size distribution in the urban atmosphere of Beijing, China [J]. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42(34): 7 967-7 980.
    [40] LIU S, HU M, WU Z, et al. Aerosol number size distribution and new particle formation at a rural/coastal site in Pearl River Delta (PRD) of China [J]. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42(25): 6 275-6 283.
    [41] M?NKK?NEN P, UMA R, SRINIVASAN D, et al. Relationship and variations of aerosol number and PM10 mass concentrations in a highly polluted urban environment―New Delhi, India [J]. Atmos Environ, 2004, 38(3): 425-433.
    [42] TAN H, YIN Y, GU X, et al. An observational study of the hygroscopic properties of aerosols over the Pearl River Delta region [J]. Atmos Environ, 2013, 77: 817-826.
    [43] DAL MASO M, KULMALA M, RIIPINEN I, et al. Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyyti?l?, Finland [J]. Boreal Environ Res, 2005, 10(5): 323-336.
    [44] YUE D L, HU M, WANG Z B, et al. Comparison of particle number size distributions and new particle formation between the urban and rural sites in the PRD region, China [J]. Atmos Environ, 2013, 76: 181-188.
    [45] BOY M, KULMALA M, RUUSKANEN T M, et al. Sulphuric acid closure and contribution to nucleation mode particle growth [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2005, 5(4): 863-878.
    [46] M?NKK?NEN P, KOPONEN I, LEHTINEN K, et al. Measurements in a highly polluted Asian mega city: Observations of aerosol number size distribution, modal parameters and nucleation events [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2005, 5(1): 57-66.
    [47] KULMALA M, PET?J? T, M?NKK?NEN P, et al. On the growth of nucleation mode particles: source rates of condensable vapor in polluted and clean environments [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2005, 5(2): 409-416.
    [48] HARRISON R M, GRENFELL J L, SAVAGE N, et al. Observations of new particle production in the atmosphere of a moderately polluted site in eastern England [J]. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(D14): 17 819-17 832.

Get Citation+

TAN Hao-bo, YIN Yan, LI Fei, et al. MEASUREMENTS OF PARTICLE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND NEW PARTICLE FORMATION EVENTS DURING WINTER IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA REGION, CHINA [J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2016, 22(2): 191-199, https://doi.org/10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009
TAN Hao-bo, YIN Yan, LI Fei, et al. MEASUREMENTS OF PARTICLE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND NEW PARTICLE FORMATION EVENTS DURING WINTER IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA REGION, CHINA [J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2016, 22(2): 191-199, https://doi.org/10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009
Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript revised: 03 February 2016
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

MEASUREMENTS OF PARTICLE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND NEW PARTICLE FORMATION EVENTS DURING WINTER IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA REGION, CHINA

doi: 10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009

Abstract: Particle number size distribution (PNSD) between 10 nm and 20 μm were measured in the Pearl River Delta(PRD) region in winter 2011. The average particle number concentration of the nucleation mode (10-20 nm), Aitken mode (20-100 nm), accumulation mode (100 nm-1 μm) and coarse mode (1-20 μm) particles were 1 552, 7 470, 4 012, and 19 cm-3, respectively. The volume concentration of accumulation mode particles with peak at 300 nm accounted for over 70% of the total volume concentration. Diurnal variations and dependencies on meteorological parameters of PNSD were investigated. The diurnal variation of nucleation mode particles was mainly influenced by new particle formation events, while the diurnal variation of Aitken mode particles correlated to the traffic emission and the growth process of nucleation mode particles. When the PRD region was controlled by a cold high pressure, conditions of low relative humidity, high wind speed and strong radiation are favorable for the occurrence of new particle formation (NPF) events. The frequency of occurrence of NPF events was 21.3% during the whole measurement period. Parameters describing NPF events, including growth rate (GR) and source rate of condensable vapor (Q), were slightly larger than those in previous literature. This suggests that intense photochemical and biological activities may be the source of condensable vapor for particle growth, even during winter in the PRD.

TAN Hao-bo, YIN Yan, LI Fei, et al. MEASUREMENTS OF PARTICLE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND NEW PARTICLE FORMATION EVENTS DURING WINTER IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA REGION, CHINA [J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2016, 22(2): 191-199, https://doi.org/10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009
Citation: TAN Hao-bo, YIN Yan, LI Fei, et al. MEASUREMENTS OF PARTICLE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND NEW PARTICLE FORMATION EVENTS DURING WINTER IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA REGION, CHINA [J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2016, 22(2): 191-199, https://doi.org/10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009
Reference (48)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return