HTML
-
Figure 5 shows the horizontal distributions of radar reflectivity and wind field at 2 km height when the rainband passed through the mountain. Figs. 5a-5c indicate that in the CTL experiment the radar reflectivity in the mountain area (> 40 dBZ) is higher than the surroundings, which is consistent with the rainfall distribution. The southeasterly cyclonic flow is perpendicular to the direction of the mountain range, and the wind speed reaches 30 m s-1 or more (Figs. 5a-5c), the high wind speed could play an important role for air passing a mountain. In the NoTer experiment, most areas of the rainband belongs to the stratiform precipitation with several convective cells embedded, and the horizontal wind field is similar to that in the CTL experiment (Figs. 5d-5f).
Figure 5. Horizontal distribution of simulated radar reflectivity (shading, dBZ) and wind vectors at 2 km height during 1530- 1730 UTC on August 23 within the blue rectangle of Fig. 1a in (a)-(c) the CTL experiment and (d)-(f) the NoTer experiment. The lines A-A1, B-B1 and C-C1 are the locations of the corresponding vertical profiles in Fig. 8. The black dashed elongated box S1 perpendicular to the Dayao Mountain indicates the area for calculating mean radar reflectivity along the box shown in Fig. 10. The solid black lines with light to dark colors indicate the terrain heights of 400 m, 700 m, 1000 m and 1300m, respectively.
On studying this type of overhill wet airflow, we can introduce the wet Froude number (Fw = U/NwH) for analysis (Chu and Lin [27]). Where U is the speed of upstream wind that is perpendicular to the mountain range, H is the terrain height above the sea level, Nw (= g/θv∙∂θv/∂z) is the wet Brunt-Väisälä frequency or wet static stability, and Fw is one of the most important dimensionless parameters to determine whether the airflow tends to climb or bypass mountains. For a given terrain height, the weak low-level wind (Fw < 1) tends to be blocked by the terrain and thus induces a convergence on the windward side of the terrain. However, the strong low-level wind (Fw > 1) tends to climb over the terrain (Smolarkiewicz and Rotunno [28-29]; Li et al. [13]). The height of the Dayao Mountain is around 1200 meters and the average wind speed upstream is 26-37 m s-1. The calculated Nw is about 0.013 s−1, and this value is closely related to the typical magnitude of low-level static stability (about 10−2 s−1) (Yu and Cheng [18]; Yu and Tsai [14]). After calculation the F w is about 1.5-2.5, which is even larger for lower terrain. Thus, the airflow is more likely to climb over the hill, and produce uplift on the windward slope side, favoring the rainfall enhancement.
Although Fw may serve as an effective control parameter for the propagation of orographic precipitation, it may not completely represent some flow characteristics, and the environmental conditions of rainband are also very important to the convection development (Chen and Lin [30]). We analyze the TlogP diagram at point Q, located on the upslope of the mountain in the CTL experiment, where the air is saturated below 500 hPa and clearly shows a humid and saturated environment with a lifting condensation level (LCL) at about 850 hPa and the convective available potential energy (CAPE) not exceeding 400 J kg−1 (Fig. 6a). This configuration with small CAPE and large wind speed is similar to the flow regime Ⅲ or Ⅳ proposed by Chen and Lin [30]. In the NoTer experiment, after removing the mountain, the CAPE is lower, indicating a weaker convection in the rainband (Fig. 6b).
-
The horizontal distribution of vertical velocity in the two experiments can be seen in Fig. 7. The distribution of vertical velocity in the CTL experiment is consistent with the terrain, with an updraft on the windward side and a downdraft on the leeward side (Figs. 7a-7c). This structure can be shown more clearly in the vertical cross-section. The vertical motion on the upslope gradually increases from bottom to summit, and peaks before the slope decreases, with a maximum of more than 4 m s-1 and a vertical thickness of about 8 km (Figs. 8d-8f). Similarly, convective cells develop vigorously and extend to a higher level along the windward upslope (Figs. 8a-8c). Besides, there is a weak divergence on the windward slope at the low levels, and a weak convergence on the leeward slope. Meanwhile, the horizontal wind speed of overmountain airflow increases with height below 2 km level in the vertical direction, The maximum wind of 37 m s-1 is at the height between 5 and 7 km (Fig. 8a). It can be explained that as the velocity of overhill airflow increases with height on the windward side, causing the contraction of the vertical air column and the divergence of the horizontal air, and the leeward side is the opposite (Sun [32]).
Figure 7. Horizontal distribution of simulated vertical velocity (shading, units: m s-1) at 2 km height during 1530-1730 UTC on August 23 for (a)-(c) the CTL experiment, (d)-(f) the NoTer experiment, (g)-(i) the difference of the CTL experiment minus NoTer experiment, and (j)-(l) the terrain-forced vertical velocity calculated from Eq. 1. The solid black lines with light to dark colors indicate the terrain heights of 400 m, 700 m, 1000 m and 1300m, respectively.
Figure 8. (a)-(c) Vertical cross-sections of the simulated radar reflectivity (shading, units: dBZ) and wind vectors crossing the lines AA1, BB1 and CC1 depicted in Figs. 5a-5c. (d)-(f) the same as (a)-(c), but for the vertical velocity (shading, units: m s-1), horizontal wind speed (green solid lines, units: m s-1) and divergence (the solid and dashed contours are the positive and negative values of divergence, units: 10−3 s−1); the black shading area represents the terrain height near the Dayao Mountain.
To further illustrate the relationship between the topography and upward motion, the forced vertical velocity Wf resulted from the lifting effect of the mountain is defined as follows (Yu and Cheng [17]):
$$ {W_f}(x, y, t) = \mathit{u}\left( {h, t} \right)\frac{{\partial h\left( {x, y} \right)}}{{\partial x}} + \mathit{v}\left( {h, t} \right)\frac{{\partial h\left( {x, y} \right)}}{{\partial y}}, $$ (1) where h is the terrain height, and u and v represent the east-west and south-north flow components of upstream oncoming wind, respectively. According to Wu et al. [10], u and v are derived from the wind vectors of the lowest model layer. Eq. 1 has been used in many previous studies to evaluate the relative importance of orographic lifting and other convective forcings associated with synoptic and / or mesoscale systems (Lin et al. [21]; Dong et al. [33]; Lin and Wu [34]). The calculated results are close to the difference of the CTL minus NoTer (Figs. 7g-7l). Therefore, the low-level vertical velocity mainly comes from terrain forcing, rather than the vertical motion in the rainband.
On the lee side, vertical velocity is negative and is less than - 3 m s-1 as air flows downhill, but this downdraft changes suddenly, with air moving upward (Figs. 8d-8f). At 1530 UTC, the updraft is 1-3 m s-1 and there is convergence zone below the upward motion in the profile (Fig. 8a). Similarly, there is increased upward motion on the leeward side at 1630 and 1730 UTC (Fig. 8b and Fig. 8e). Jtl et al. [23] stated that the upward motion at lee side should be considered as the results of lee side convergence in typhoon environment. It is also similar to the hydraulic jump effect at the lee side described by Durran et al. [34], that can be explained as a kind of energy conversion in which the potential energy is converted into kinematic energy along the downslope. Thus, the over-mountain flow forms a dense flow near the summit, which accelerates downhill along the slope to create an upward lee side motion. However, because there is too little rainwater on the leeward side, and the strengthening effect of updraft on precipitation is weak, so much less precipitation occurs on the leeward side.
Figure 9 shows the vertical cross section of vertical velocity, equivalent potential temperature, and specific humidity. The maximum specific humidity is at low levels and decreases with height (Figs. 9a−9c). Fundamentally, there is a large amount of low-level moist airflow in the typhoon rainband (Jtl et al. [23]). The water vapor carried by the lower wind accumulates in front of the mountain, forcing the air to move upward and transport water vapor due to the orographic lifting, then the moisture and energy of the air column over the windward slope increase continuously, which is showed that the large value area of equivalent potential temperature extends upward, reaching the maximum at 4 − 6 km height (Figs. 9a−9c). This moist airflow is easy to condense and release latent heat when it is lifted, which further increases the instability of the area and the development of vertical movement. Tang et al. [21] reported that the steep topography greatly enhances the upward motion on the windward slope, leading to heavy rainfall and the release of huge latent heat.
-
To further analyze the characteristics of rainfall system influenced by topography, we select the region S1 in Fig. 5c, which is perpendicular to the mountain direction and roughly parallel to the flow passing through. The convective system intensifies and the reflectivity reaches more than 40 dBZ most of the time on the mountain peak when the rainband passed through (Fig. 10). Thus, there is a question, is it possible that these convective cells are triggered on the windward slope? About the generation of convective cells, it can be estimated roughly by advection time and cloud growth time (Stein et al. [35]). The advection time is calculated by a/ U, where a is the mountain half-width and U is the velocity of the over-mountain flow. The timing of cloud growth is controlled by microphysical processes that are quite complex and difficult to estimate (Kirshbaum and Smith [37]). The advection time is about 9 minutes by calculation, it is difficult to determine whether the ascending time of air is long enough to form convective clouds. On the other hand, Chen and Lin regarded that it is more inclined to form stratiform clouds precipitation at the peaks when strong wind passes through small mountains with large Fw and small CAPE [30].
Figure 10. (a) Temporal variation of simulated radar reflectivity (shading, units: dBZ) and vertical velocity (black solid and dashed lines indicate the positive and negative values, respectively, units: m s−1) at 2 km height from 1300 UTC to 2000 UTC on August 23 when the rainband passed over the Dayao Mountain. The selected area is within the rectangular black box S1 (shown in Fig. 5c), and the data is averaged in the direction normal to the orientation of the box. The corresponding terrain height is denoted by the black shading.
Therefore, we guess it may be related to the passing of the typhoon rainband. the typhoon rainband not only contains abundant water vapor and strong wind, but also is composed of many convective cells, which move cyclonically with the wind field. When passing through the terrain, these convective cells are bound to be affected. Moreover, though the rainband passing Dayao Mountain is not strong convection area, it also contains convective cells with different organizational degrees (Figs. 3d-3i). We can see that a lot of convective cells exist upstream before reaching the foot of the mountain in the rainband (Fig. 10). As the study of Smith et al. [20], it seems that the passage of typhoon rainband plays an important role in the enhancement of precipitation in island of Dominica, where with a very short upslope range and there are no orographic convections. In the next section, we will discuss in detail the influence of terrain on these convective cells in the rainband.
-
To illustrate the influence of topography, we compare the structure characteristics of convective cells in the rainband around the Dayao Mountain in the CTL and NoTer experiment. Firstly, four movable convective cells are selected in the CTL experiment from 1745 UTC to 1815 UTC, marked as 1, 2, 3 and 4. They are 100-150 km away from the typhoon center, with spatial scales of 10-20 km, and are generated in the upstream of the rainband (Fig. 11a). When moving downstream with the wind, the convective cells which are farther away from the mountain first strengthen at 1800 UTC and then weaken at 1815 UTC (1 and 2). In addition, the convective cells that have reached the mountain foot become stronger and larger after climbing the mountain, no matter they strengthened or weakened before (3 and 4). However, they do not stay for a long time at the mountain peak, and then gradually weaken and die out on the leeward slope (Figs. 11a-11c). The convective cells are marked as a, b, c and d in NoTer experiment. These convective cells are also generated at the tail of the spiral rainband and weaken to below 30 dBZ as the flow moves downstream (Figs. 11d-11f). This situation is consistent with previous studies. When there is no influence of external circumstances such as topography, generally, initial convective cells are in the upstream of rainband, the matured convective cells are in the midstream, and the extensive stratiform precipitation is in the downstream (May [5]; Akter and Tsuboki [38]).
Figure 11. Horizontal distributions of radar reflectivity (shading, units: dBZ) and wind vectors at 2 km height during 1745-1815 UTC on August 23 in (a) the CTL experiment and (b) the NoTer experiment. The grey solid line indicates the terrain height of 500 m.
Figure 12 shows the vertical cross-sections of the convective cells in Fig. 11. The vertical thickness of these convective cells is about 7 km, and there are obvious upward motion and downward motion in cells 1 and 2, which is the structure of mature convective cells. In the cells 3 and 4 on the windward slope there is strong upward motion to reach 7 km, they seem to be developing and strengthening further (Fig. 12a). In the NoTer experiment, the cells in the downstream are in the weakening stage with gradually increasing downdrafts and more stratiform cloud precipitation. This shows that when convective cells in the rainband passes through the mountain, the upward movement will be strengthened by the orographic lifting, resulting the cells to develop further. After the cells continues to move downstream in the leeward slope, they quickly weaken to dissipate.
Figure 12. (a) Vertical cross-sections of radar reflectivity (shading, units: dBZ), vertical vorticity (blue solid and dashed lines indicate the positive and negative values, respectively, units: m s-1) and the wind vectors along the black dashed line D-D1 in Fig. 11b; (b) is the same as (a), but for the black dashed line E-E1 in Fig. 11e.
In the above analysis, it has been shown that it is conducive to precipitation when the typhoon low-level airflow is lifted by the terrain, and the convective cells strengthened because the orographic effects in the rainband, which further intensify the rainfall. However, there are still unresolved issues in our analysis: how do rainfall particles grow and fall, and whether the stronger the convection in the rainband, the stronger the rainfall when passes through the terrain. These problems need to be further explored.