HTML
-
The tropical cyclone tracks in the Northwest Pacific region have strong complexity in spatial distributions. To improve simulation quality, tropical cyclone tracks are classified into five classes on the basis of the movement characteristics and steering positions in conjunction with the researchers'personal experience, as shown in Fig. 1. The five classes include the following: 1) Class 1 refers to the tropical cyclones whose tracks head west in an almost straight line; 2) Class 2 includes the tropical cyclones whose tracks head northwest in an almost straight line; 3) Class 3 stands for the turned tropical cyclones whose turning point locates in latitudesgreater than 30° N; 4) Class 4 contains the turned tropical cyclones whose turning point locates in latitudes between 20° N and 30° N; 5) Class 5 contains the turned tropical cyclones whose turning point locates in latitudes less than 20° N. With the five different tropical cyclone classes categorized, all subsequent steps for tropical cyclone track simulation are separately performed for each class. Specifically, the proportion Pi (i = 1, …, 5) of each historical tropical cyclone class and the corresponding frequency interval $\left[ {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{i - 1} {{p_i}} \sum\limits_{i = 0}^i {{p_i}} } \right](i = 1, \ldots , 5) $ are first calculated, in which po is specified as zero. For each tropical cyclone track simulation, a random number r (0 < r < 1), obeying uniform distribution, is generated with Monte Carlo simulation method. The corresponding tropical cyclone class is obtained on the basis of the interval in which it falls.
-
In genesis model, the kernel probability density function (KPDF) is used to simulate the annual occurrence number and genesis positions of tropical cyclones. The basic KPDF f(x) is shown as follows:
$$ f(\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}) = \frac{1}{{nh}}\sum _{i = 1}^n K \left( {\frac{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}} - {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_i}}}{h}} \right), $$ (1) where x is the estimated vector, xi is the ith sample vector, n is the sample size, h is the bandwidth, K(·) is the kernel density function, and the Guassian kernel function is used in this study.
The basic KPDF presented in Eq. (1) is used to simulate the annual occurrence number. Given that h is a key to accurate estimation of the KPDF, the one-dimensional biased cross-validation method proposed by Scott et al. [20], as shown in Eq. (2), is used to calculate the optimal h of the annual occurrence number.
$$ \operatorname{BCV}(h) \equiv \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{\pi} n h}+\frac{1}{64 n^{2} h \sqrt{\pi}} \sum\limits_{j=1}^{n} \sum\limits_{i<j}\left(\Delta_{i j}^{4}-12 \Delta_{i j}^{2}+12\right) e^{-\frac{\Delta_{ij}^{2}}{4}}, $$ (2) where Δij = (xi-xj)/h. xi and xj are the ith and jth typhoon annual sample numbers, respectively.
A three-dimensional KPDF is used to estimate the space-time probability density of tropical cyclone genesis positions. The space-time of tropical cyclone genesis positions is composed of the following three dimensions: latitude, longitude, and time. The three-dimensional KPDF and its biased cross-validation method (Sain et al.[21]) used in this study are given as follows:
$$ f(x) = \frac{1}{{{{(2\pi )}^{\frac{3}{2}}}n{h_1}{h_2}{h_3}}} \cdot \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\exp } \left[ { - \frac{1}{{2{h^{_1^2}}}}{{\left( {\frac{{{x_{lat}} - {x_{lat, i}}}}{{{S_{lat}}}}} \right)}^2} - \frac{1}{{2{h^{_2^2}}}}{{\left( {\frac{{{x_{lon}} - {x_{lon, i}}}}{{{S_{lon}}}}} \right)}^2} - \frac{1}{{2{h^{_3^2}}}}{{\left( {\frac{{{x_{time}} - {x_{time, i}}}}{{{S_{{\rm{tine}}}}}}} \right)}^2}} \right], $$ (3) $$ {\rm{BCV}}\left( {{h_1},{h_2}{h_3}} \right) = \frac{1}{{{{(2\sqrt \pi )}^3}n{h_1}{h_2}{h_3}}} + \frac{1}{{4n(n - 1){h_1}{h_2}{h_3}}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\sum\limits_{j = i} {\left[ {{{\left( {\sum\limits_{k = 1}^3 {\Delta _{ijk}^2} } \right)}^2} - 10\sum\limits_{k = 1}^3 {\Delta _{ijk}^2} + 15} \right]} } \left[ {\frac{1}{{2\pi \sqrt {2\pi } }}\exp \left( { - \frac{{\sum\limits_{k = 1}^3 {\Delta _{ijk}^2} }}{2}} \right)} \right], $$ (4) where h1, h2, and h3 are the optimal bandwidths of the latitude, longitude, and time, respectively. xlat, xlon, andxtime are the simulated genesis positions. xlat, i, xlon, i, and xtime, i are the ith historical genesis positions. Slat, Slon and Stime are the mean square error of latitude, longitude, and time, respectively. Δijk = (xik-xjk)/hk (k = 1, 2, 3). xik and xik are the ith and jth normalized variables in the kth dimension, respectively.
To consider the periodicity in the time dimension of tropical cyclone genesis positions with a period of 0-366 days[18], we expand the historical tropical cyclone genesis positions thrice in the time dimension to consider the influence of last year and next year genesis positions on the probability densities of tropical cyclone genesis positions this year. In addition, given that the three dimensions of tropical cyclone genesis positions have different quantities and units, the historical tropical cyclone genesis positions should be normalized to avoid one or more dimensions dominating the others in the probability densities of tropical cyclone genesis positions.
-
By setting the longitude direction as x-axis and the latitude direction as y-axis, the traveling model based on the means and mean square errors of tropical cyclone tracks in latitude and longitude directions proposed by Hall and Jewson[14] is used and is given as follows:
$$ {x_{n + 1}} = {\bar x_{n + 1}} + {{\bf{\varsigma }}_{x, n + 1}}{S_{x\_rms, n + 1}}~~{y_{n + 1}} = {\bar y_{n + 1}} + {{\bf{\varsigma }}_{{\rm{y, n}} + 1}}{S_{y\_rms, n + 1}}, $$ (5) $$ {{\bar x}_{n + 1}} = \frac{{\sum _i {{x_i}} {e^{ - d_i^2/2{L^2}}}}}{{\sum _i {{e^{ - d_i^2/2{L^2}}}} }}{{\bar y}_{n + 1}} = \frac{{\sum _i {{y_i}} {e^{ - d_i^2/2{L^2}}}}}{{\sum _i {{e^{ - d_i^2/2{L^2}}}} }}, $$ (6) $$ S_{{\rm{x}}_{r m s, n+1}}=\sqrt{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{N}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}_{n+1}\right)^{2} / N} S_{y_{m s, n+1}}=\sqrt{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{N}\left(y_{i}-\bar{y}_{n+1}\right)^{2} / N}, $$ (7) $$ {{\bf{\varsigma }}_{x, n + 1}} = {\phi _{x, n}}{{\tilde x}_n} + {s_{x, n}}{\varepsilon _x}\quad {{\bf{\varsigma }}_{y, n + 1}} = {\phi _{y, n}}{{\tilde y}_n} + {s_{y, n}}{\varepsilon _y}, $$ (8) $$ \tilde{x}_{n}=\frac{x_{n}-\bar{x}_{n}}{\sigma_{x, n}} ~~~\tilde{y}_{n}=\frac{y_{n}-\bar{y}_{n}}{\sigma_{y, n}} $$ (9) $$ \sigma_{x, n}=\sqrt{\frac{\sum _{i}\left(x-x_{i}\right)^{2} e^{-d^{2} / 2 L^{2}}}{\sum _{i} e^{-d_{i}^{2} / 2 L^{2}}}} \quad \sigma_{y, n}=\sqrt{\frac{\sum _{i}\left(y-y_{i}\right)^{2} e^{-d_{i}^{2} / 2 L^{2}}}{\sum _{i} e^{-d_{i}^{2} / 2 L^{2}}}}, $$ (10) where x and y are the simulated 6 h displacement in longitude and latitude directions, respectively. $ {\bar x}$ and ${\bar y} $ are the mean 6 h historical displacements in longitude and latitude directions, respectively. Sx_rms and Sy_rms are the mean square errors in longitude and latitude directions, respectively. xi and yi are the historical 6 h displacements in longitude and latitude directions, respectively. ζx and ζy are the normalized coefficients in longitude and latitude directions, respectively. ${\tilde x} $ and ${\tilde y} $ are the normalized simulated displacement in longitude and latitude directions, respectively. fx and fy are the correlation coefficients in longitude and latitude directions, respectively. sx and sy are deviation factors, and s2 = 1 - f2. ex and ey are free errors. σx and σy are weighted variances within the corresponding scale range of the current point in each direction. L is the length scale. N is the sample size. Subscript n represents the specific nth step. di is the great circle distance.
-
The lysis of tropical cyclone is linked to its intensity, but the intensity model has not yet been developed. Thus, the termination probability model
$$ p(r)=\frac{\sum _{i} \Theta_{i} e^{-d_{i}^{2} / 2 L^{2}}}{\sum _{i} e^{-d_{i}^{2} / 2 L^{2}}}, $$ (11) where p(r) is the termination probability at current position r. Θi is the termination factor, when position i is the final point of a tropical cyclone; Θi = 1, otherwise Θi = 0.
After p(r) is calculated, a random number between 0 and 1 is immediately generated. If p(r) is greater than the random number, then this point becomes the final point of tropical cyclone track. To control the length of tropical cyclone track, simulation step is limited within 100.
-
The simulation of tropical cyclone tracks can be summarized as follows: 1) Generate the start point of tropical cyclone track on the basis of the genesis model. This point is the first current point of the simulation track; 2) Determine the tropical cyclone class of the simulation track; 3) Obtain the second point of tropical cyclone track with distances x and y that typhoon moves in latitude and longitude directions in the first step with the equations $ x=\bar{x}+\varepsilon_{x} S_{x_{-r m s}}$ and $y = \bar y + {\varepsilon _y}{S_{y\_rms}} $, respectively, where $ {\bar x}$ and ${\bar y} $ are the mean 6 h historical displacements in longitude and latitude directions of the first point, respectively, ex and ey are the free errors, and Sx_rms and Sy_rms are the mean square errors; 4) Obtain the subsequent points of tropical cyclone track with the traveling model; 5) For each point of the simulation track, the lysis model is used to determine whether the typhoon is terminated. If terminated, then the simulation track is completed. Otherwise, simulation step 4) is continued until the typhoon is terminated, and a completed simulation track can be obtained; 6) Repeat the above steps until enough completed tropical cyclone tracks are simulated.
3.1. Classification
3.2. Genesis model
3.3. Traveling model
3.4. Lysis model
3.5. Simulation procedures
-
To quantitatively evaluate the classification model performance, the spatial density of each set of tropical cyclone tracks in the Northwest Pacific region (i. e., number of 6 h tropical cyclone positions per area) is computed. The average spatial density of the 30-set ensemble of tropical cyclone tracks is computed and compared with the historical results, as illustrated in Fig. 9. Fig. 9(a) and 9(b) shows that the basic spatial distribution features of the historical tropical cyclone tracks can be well captured by the simulated tropical cyclone tracks. Although additional historical tropical cyclone tracks can be found in the tropical cyclone concentration regions, only few differences can be found in most regions. Fig. 9(c) shows the mean square error of the spatial density of tropical cyclone tracks. The value is greater than 10 in tropical cyclone concentration regions and less than 5 in most other regions. Fig. 9(d) presents the z-score value, that is, the historical distribution minus the average simulated distribution divided by the historical distribution. The z-score values in most regions fall into the range from - 0.3 to 0.3, which indicates that the simulation results are satisfactory. By contrast, the z-score values in few regions are high by more than one because these regions have few historical or simulated tropical cyclones.
-
The evaluation of latitude and longitude crossings is performed through the count comparisons of tropical cyclones crossing different latitude and longitude lines. In this study, comparisons of latitude and longitude crossings are performed in four different scenarios. Fig. 10(a) and 10(b) shows the counts of tropical cyclones crossing the 10°N: 10°: 50°N latitude lines. The number of crossings increases by 100 each time along the direction of increasing vertical coordinate to avoid overlapping of the drawing curves. This treatment is also used in other cases. Fig. 10(c) and 10(d) illustrates the counts of tropical cyclones crossing the 100° N: 10° : 180° E longitude lines. In most regions, the simulation spread is encompassed by the historical crossings. This result is consistent with the underestimation in the spatial density distribution of tropical cyclones in tropical cyclone concentration regions.
-
The landfall count of tropical cyclone for the concerned region is important for tropical cyclone risk assessment. A coarse model of China's coastline is constructed using 16-line segments, as shown in Fig. 11 (a), and the coordinates are presented in Table 1. Fig. 11 (b) illustrates the historical and simulated landfall counts along China's coastline. The trend of simulated landfall count along the coastline is close to the historical landfall count, but relatively large differences appear in segments 3, 10, and 16. Fig. 11(c) shows the z-score value of landfall counts along the coastline. Three peak values appear in segments 10, 12, and 14 because the landfall counts in these segments are small, resulting in a relatively large deviation.
Number Segment Starting point (lon, lat) Ending point coordinate (lon, lat) 1 AB (109.5704°E, 18.1619°N) (110.5392°E, 18.7884°N) 2 BC (110.5392°E, 18.7884°N) (111.0440°E, 9.64550°N) 3 CD (111.0440°E, 19.6455°N) (110.6591°E, 21.0838°N) 4 DE (110.6591°E, 21.0838°N) (112.7963°E, 21.5754°N) 5 EF (112.7963°E, 21.5754°N) (114.3846°E, 22.2170°N) 6 FG (114.3846°E, 22.2170°N) (116.4978°E, 22.9332°N) 7 GH (116.4978°E, 22.9332°N) (118.1514°E, 24.2633°N) 8 HI (118.1514°E, 24.2633°N) (119.8488°E, 25.4156°N) 9 IJ (119.8488°E, 25.4156°N) (120.1833°E, 26.5890°N) 10 JK (120.1833°E, 26.5890°N) (121.0000°E, 27.7432°N) 11 KL (121.0000°E, 27.7432°N) (122.4667°E, 29.6788°N) 12 LM (122.4667°E, 29.6788°N) (122.4667°E, 29.6788°N) 13 MN (122.2506°E, 31.2790°N) (121.0401°E, 33.0723°N) 14 NO (121.0401°E, 33.0723°N) (120.0403°E, 34.5873°N) 15 PQ (120.8714°E, 21.9073°N) (121.5108°E, 23.3723°N) 16 QR (121.5108°E, 23.3723°N) (122.0415°E, 25.0691°N) Table 1. The latitude and longitude coordinates of each segment.