-
Abstract:
Based on the parallel air temperature data of automatic sounding and manual observations at 16 weather stations in Hainan province from 2004 to 2005, a comparative analysis and evaluation is made for validity according to relevant standards. The results indicate that there are daily and seasonal differences between temperature observations recorded by automatic weather stations (AWSs) and with conventional methods. The reasons for the differences are the systematic error, the sensitivity of the two types of instruments to the environmental temperature change, the difference of the observation time and the effect of solar radiation. Because the long-range data were obtained from manual observation, an empirical conversion formula between the temperature records obtained by the instruments is provided for continuous use of the climate data after the changes in instruments.
-
References
[1]
|
HU Yu-feng. Differences between data of automatic and manual observation [J]. Quart. J. Appl. Meteor., 2004, 15(6): 719-726. |
[2]
|
GU Ping-qiang, WANG Mei-hua. Comparison oftemperature and relative humidity between automatic weatherstation type 2 and conventional observation station [J]. Meteor.Mon., 2003(1): 35. |
[3]
|
WU Hui, CHEN Xiao-li. Multi-time scales analysis ofclimate variation in Hainan province during 40 years [J]. J.Trop. Meteor., 2003, 19(2): 213-218. |
[4]
|
LI Chen-guang, LIU Shu-yuan, TAO Zu-yu. Review ofwind profiler data of Hong Kong during IOP of HUAMEX andSCSMEX [J]. J. Trop. Meteor., 2003, 19(3): 269-276. |
[5]
|
GUO Xi-qin, ZENG Shu-er, WANG Jin-zhao. Field testsand measurement accuracy of automatic weather stations(AWS)[J]. Quart. J. Appl. Meteor., 1994, 5(2): 176-183. |
[6]
|
GUO Xi-qin, ZENG Shu-er, WANG Jin-zhao. The resultsof field comparison of the remote meteorological observingstations [J]. Meteor. Mon., 1994, 20(5): 24-27. |
[7]
|
WANG Bao-jian, CHEN Xu-hui, TAO Jian-hong, et al.Comparison study of CAWS600-R AWS data and conventionalobservation [J]. Meteor. Sci. Tech., 2004, 32(4): 281-285. |
[8]
|
LIU Zhi-ren. Quality evaluation of observation by remotesensing apparatus model Ⅱ[J]. Meteor. Mon., 2004(1): 50-53. |
[9]
|
LIU Jian-hua, HU Qing-rong. The comparing and analyzingof meteorological key element of the routine stands betweenthe automatic weather station and artificially station [J].Jiangxi Meteor. Sci. & Tech., 2005, 28(2): 57-58. |
[10]
|
XU Ke-wen, QIU Gai-hui, YUAN Jian-zhong. Contrastanalysis of data observed by automatic meteorological stationand manual meteorological station [J]. Shanxi Meteor. Quart.,2003(3): 35-39. |
[11]
|
XIONG An-yuan, ZHU Yan-jun, REN Zhi-hua, et al.Differences of surface temperature observations recorded bydifferent sensors in different screens and its causes [J]. ActaMeteorologica Sinica, 2006, 64(3): 377-384. |
[12]
|
WANG Ying, LIU Xiao-ning. Comparative analysis ofAWS and man-observed temperatures [J]. Quart. J. Appl.Meteor., 2002, 13(6): 741-748. |
[13]
|
ZHAI Pan-mao. Some gross errors and biases in China'shistorical radiosonde data [J]. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 1997,55(5): 563-572. |
-
-
-